Legal victory!

Defending Public Access to the Great Lakes Shoreline

MEA represents Shorewood resident Paul Florsheim in a case that could have significant implications for the public’s right to access and enjoy the Great Lakes. The case is pending in Milwaukee County Circuit Court.

Case Summary

MEA client Paul Florsheim succesfully appealed a January 2026 municipal court decision that found him guilty of trespassing for walking along a stretch of the Lake Michigan shoreline north of Atwater Beach in the Village of Shorewood.  

The case stems from an incident last summer in which a lakefront property owner confronted Mr. Florsheim, accused him of trespassing, and later called the police. Although Mr. Florsheim explained that the state constitution and the public trust doctrine protect the public’s right to walk on dry land between the ordinary high water mark and the water’s edge, he was issued a $313 trespassing ticket by Village of Shorewood police. 

When Mr. Florsheim contested the citation, a municipal court judge ruled in favor of the Village, pointing to Doemel v. Jantz, a 1923 Wisconsin Supreme Court decision involving public access to Lake Winnebago, which found that members of the public are subject to trespassing laws unless their feet are in the water.  

Midwest Environmental Advocates continued to represent Mr. Florsheim when he filed an appeal in Milwaukee County Circuit Court. We argued that the state constitution and the public trust doctrine protect the public’s right to walk on dry land between the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) and the water’s edge.

On September 3,  the court affirmed that right, finding that Mr. Florsheim’s walk was a protected activity under the public trust doctrine and that the Village could not enforce its trespass ordinance against him.
 
Although the direct impact of the decision is limited to the dismissal of Mr. Florsheim’s ticket, we believe the principles affirmed in this case should be broadly applied, and we look forward to continuing to defend the public’s right to access and enjoy our Great Lakes shorelines.

MEA client Paul Florsheim

Shorewood, WI

The Public Trust Doctrine

Wisconsin’s public trust doctrine requires state government to prevent the impairment of public waters and their uses. While these uses were once understood to include only access to public waters for navigation and commercial purposes, the public trust is now understood to encompass public rights to water quantity and quality, recreational uses and scenic beauty.

Case Timeline

Municipal citation: July 28, 2025
Village of Shorewood police issue $313 trespassing citation to Paul Florsheim.

Municipal court decision: January 28, 2026
Municipal judge finds in favor of Village of Shorewood.

Appeal of municipal court decision: February 12, 2026
Mr. Florsheim files appeal of municipal court decision in Milwaukee County Circuit Court.

Plaintiff’s Opening Brief: May 21, 2026
Village of Shorewood files opening brief.

Defendant’s Response Brief: June 23, 2026
Mr. Florsheim files response brief.

Circuit Court Hearing: August 13, 2026
Judge J. D. Watts hears oral arguments and indicates that he will issue a written decision on September 4.

Defending Our Rights Under the Public Trust Doctrine

LEGAL ACTION

Securing the Constitutional Rights of Wisconsin Youth to a Stable Climate

MEA and Our Children’s Trust are representing fifteen young people from Wisconsin who filed a groundbreaking climate lawsuit against the Wisconsin Legislature and the Public Service Commission for enacting and enforcing unconstitutional laws that exacerbate the climate crisis.

LEARN MORE

LEGAL ACTION

Upholding the Public Trust Doctrine in Sturgeon Bay

A proposed hotel development would have put Public Trust land in private hands and limited public access to Lake Michigan’s shoreline. With legal representation from MEA, the Friends of the Sturgeon Bay Public Waterfront successfully challenged the proposal.

LEARN MORE

LEGAL ACTION

Defending the State’s Ability to Regulate High-Capacity Wells

MEA represented the Central Sands Water Action Coalition as a friend of the court in a case involving the DNR’s authority to consider the cumulative impact of high-capacity wells when it issues water-withdrawal permits. After years of litigation, the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued a decision in July 2021 affirming that authority.

LEARN MORE

LEGAL ACTION

Monitoring the Implementation of the Great Lakes Compact in Racine

MEA monitors requests to divert water from the Great Lakes to ensure that all diversions meet the letter and spirit of the Great Lakes Compact.

LEARN MORE