A Win for Climate Justice! Regulators Reject Utility Company’s Proposal to Overhaul Residential Solar Policy

Facebook
LinkedIn
X
Email

MADISON, WI—At a meeting of the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSC) today, regulators rejected a proposal by Madison Gas & Electric (MGE) to overhaul net metering, a process that allows rooftop solar owners to be compensated for excess energy generated and returned to the grid.

350 Wisconsin, a nonprofit organization focused on climate and environmental justice, applauded the PSC’s decision, calling it a win for climate justice. As an intervenor in the case, 350 Wisconsin submitted detailed testimony in opposition to MGE’s proposal. According to Midwest Environmental Advocates (MEA), the nonprofit law firm that represents 350 Wisconsin, MGE’s proposal would have increased the amount of time it takes to recoup the cost of solar panel installation. As a result, the proposal would have exacerbated climate inequity by putting rooftop solar further out of reach for low- and middle-income Wisconsinites.

“Affordable rooftop solar has an important role to play in accelerating the transition from dirty fossil fuels to clean, renewable sources of energy and ensuring that the transition is just and equitable,” said MEA Senior Staff Attorney Dan Gustafson.

The PSC’s rejection of the proposal to end net metering preserves rooftop solar as a viable economic option just as new tax credits and rebates available through the Federal Inflation Reduction Act are expected to make the installation of rooftop solar more affordable.

“The PSC’s decision to preserve net metering couldn’t have come at a better time. Mitigating the worst impacts of climate change requires us to dramatically scale up alternatives to fossil fuels as quickly as possible and at every level,” said Stephanie Robinson, Co-Executive Director of 350 Wisconsin.
MGE’s proposal drew significant criticism from members of the public at a public hearing in September. All those who testified at the hearing asked the PSC to reject the proposal, with no one speaking in support.

At the September hearing, Madison resident Mark Putman told the commission, “The proposed changes to the net metering policy will be a major setback. I am strongly against them because they are going to set us back in our goal to transition to clean energy.” Putman also said, “People who put solar panels on their rooftops are doing a service for the rest of the community. They are reducing pollution in air and water, [which] protects public health and reduces the impacts on our medical system, and it saves us all money.”

At today’s meeting, Commissioner Tyler Huebner thanked all of those who participated in the case, including 17 intervenors, 16 members of the public who testified at the public hearings, and over 700 who submitted written comments. He noted that “the intervenors contributed to [the PSC] having a robust and complete record,” in particular on the issues of net metering and affordability.

At today’s meeting, the PSC also took action to reduce MGE’s authorized return on equity, which will reduce the overall rate increase for MGE customers. MEA submitted detailed testimony on behalf of 350 Wisconsin outlining how MGE’s request to increase rates would have exacerbated the energy burden on low-income families.

“While we wish the PSC had gone even further, we are pleased that the commission took some action to address inequitable energy burdens by limiting shareholder profits,” said Robinson. “We expect Wisconsin’s utilities to be true leaders in an equitable transition to clean energy. They should be working to solve the crisis, not profit from it.”

MGE is not the only Wisconsin utility asking the Public Service Commission for permission to make major changes. Wisconsin Power & Light (Alliant Energy) is also seeking approval to raise rates and make changes to its net metering policies. The PSC is expected to act on Alliant’s proposal at a meeting on Thursday, November 9.

More News

Legal Victory! Court Dismisses Citation in Shorewood Beach Trespassing Case

Today, a Milwaukee County Circuit Court dismissed a trespassing citation issued to MEA client Paul Florsheim for walking along the Lake Michigan shoreline in the Village of Shorewood. The court found that Mr. Florsheim’s walk was a protected activity under the public trust doctrine and that the Village could not enforce its trespass ordinance against him.

Read More »

LEGAL VICTORY! State regulators must strengthen environmental oversight of Pierce County livestock operation

MEA clients in Pierce County have won a major victory in a three-year fight to protect their community from the impacts of a major expansion at Ridge Breeze Dairy. On August 24, an administrative law judge ruled that a DNR permit allowing the farm to expand its herd to more than 6,000 cows failed to ensure compliance with Wisconsin’s groundwater quality standards.

Read More »

Legal victory! Judge orders release of information about energy use at Meta’s Beaver Dam data center

This week, a Dane County Circuit Court sided with MEA in a dispute over the public’s right to know how the unprecedented energy needs of hyperscale data centers will impact Wisconsin. The court ruled that the Public Service Commission acted unlawfully when it denied a public records request seeking information about energy use at Meta’s Beaver Dam data center and ordered that the information be released.

Read More »

MEA Welcomes Senior Staff Attorney Tressie Kamp

Midwest Environmental Advocates is thrilled to welcome Tressie Kamp to our team as Senior Staff Attorney. Tressie’s experience in environmental enforcement, water policy, and public interest litigation makes her an incredible asset to our team. We’re excited to welcome her and know her leadership will strengthen our work on behalf of communities across Wisconsin.

Read More »