 |
 |

|
|
|
Wisconsin Ag News Headlines |
 |
DNR Implements Tougher New Rules for Large Dairy Operations
Wisconsin Ag Connection - 11/18/2008
After being pressured by an environmental group hoping to stop a
proposed 8,000-cow dairy operation in Fond du Lac County, the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources has changed its policy regarding the
approval process for new farm construction projects. On Friday, the
agency decided to begin requiring environmental impact statements for
commercial dairy and livestock operations that exceed a certain size.
The move was in response to the Midwest
Environmental Advocates and a local group of citizens, which petitioned
the DNR to look at the impact that the Rosendale Dairy will have on the
environment. The farm is in the process of expanding its facilities to
hold 4,000 dairy cows and 150 beef steers for a total of 5,750 animal
units. They would then begin a second phase that will ultimately call
for 11,500 animal units by the fall of 2010.
The DNR says they have completed an
Environmental Assessment on September 16, and received public comments
through October 14 and determined that the farm will complete an
environmental impact statement process on the proposal. The agency also
noted that in order to determine the scope and the significant issues
to be analyzed in depth in their analysis, the department 'will rely on
input already gathered through public comments on the EA and on
additional public scoping comments for the EIS.' Additional comments
from the public and government officials will also be accepted by the
DNR until December 5.
Meanwhile, the farm released it's own
public statement on Monday, which called the DNR's action an
'unnecessary burden,' but agreed to cooperate with the new rules.
"At
a time when the state of Wisconsin desperately needs new jobs, and our
communities are in dire need of reinvestment, it is true that we also
must remain vigilant about our environment," said Jim Ostrom, a partner
in Rosendale Dairy. "That is why we have spent the past two years
conducting extensive environmental research and engineering analysis of
our plans."
Ostrom said the policy change will only add cost to
the project as a result of additional document preparation fees and
other expenses. Nonetheless, he promised that the project was being
developed as one of Wisconsin's 'most environmentally sound, modern and
efficient farms' to date.
An attorney for the environmental
group praised Friday's decision, saying it will give the state more
time to study the full impact the farm will have on the local
environment. But one of Wisconsin's farm organizations says the policy
change should be looked at more closely because it could affect future
projects down the road.
"This
sets a precedent to require environmental impact statements for farms
with 4,000 or more head of cattle," said Laurie Fischer, director of
the Dairy Business Association of Wisconsin. "It marks a significant
policy shift given that Wisconsin already is home to 12 such farms."
As a result, the DBA is calling on the Doyle Administration to review the agency's actions.
"Under
previous rules, farms seeking Wisconsin Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System permits already were required to submit professionally prepared
environmental and engineering research as well as documentation for the
operating plans," Fischer said. "The policy change adds additional
mandates, timelines and cost."
Ostrom
already owns the 6,500-cow Tidy View Dairy near Kaukauna and 2,500-cow
Omro Dairy near Omro. The Rosendale project--which will include
freestall barns, milking parlors, manure handling, storage equipment,
feed storage, leachate collection and stormwater basins--is a $70
million investment by Ostrom and partners John Vosters and Todd Willer.
An anaerobic digester may also be part of the project design.
The investors say their farm will create 70
permanent local jobs, support hundreds of construction jobs and
purchase $40 million per year from local contractors and vendors.
|
 |


|
 |
|
Copyright © 2008 - USAgNet.com. All Rights Reserved. |
 |
|